Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot activation meeting on IRC - Tuesday 16th March 19:00 UTC

> back in the day we also had people that thought 10 min avg block time is too > much. Not sure what some people thought about block time interval has to do with me. Also these are the things written by Greg Maxwell and Chris Belcher about it that I agree with and been sharing from sometime

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot activation meeting on IRC - Tuesday 16th March 19:00 UTC

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 09:21:39AM +0100, Prayank wrote: > >??the last thing we need is > a rushed upgrade > > Why do you think this is rushed? Speedy Trial will have few months and if > UASF is required it won't involve activation immediately after ST fails. > Taproot by 2022 doesn't look

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot activation meeting on IRC - Tuesday 16th March 19:00 UTC

> the last thing we need is a rushed upgrade Why do you think this is rushed? Speedy Trial will have few months and if UASF is required it won't involve activation immediately after ST fails. Taproot by 2022 doesn't look rushed approach IMO. > We're not changing things that we worked out

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot activation meeting on IRC - Tuesday 16th March 19:00 UTC

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 05:20:04PM +, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote: > At the previous meeting, there was consensus for BIP8 activation parameters > except for LOT, assuming a release around this time. Since then, a release > has not occurred, and the new idea of Speedy Trial has been

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot activation meeting on IRC - Tuesday 16th March 19:00 UTC

I am referring to the timeline and recommendation from the meeting on February 16th, which has been slowly making progress toward a release: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Taproot_activation_proposal_202102 The first period from height 693504-695520 here overlaps with the last period of AChow's ST

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot activation meeting on IRC - Tuesday 16th March 19:00 UTC

Can you expand on the timeline issue? Which timelines are incompatible and why? It does seem like a release done *today* cannot happen anyways, so it sounds like it's already too late... or do you mean beginning the release process today? -- @JeremyRubin

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot activation meeting on IRC - Tuesday 16th March 19:00 UTC

While I agree 24 hours is too short notice, if someone wishes to insist on keeping the current timeline, software supporting it should be released _today_. Putting the meeting off a week would almost necessarily imply rejection of any desires to stick to the original plan. So for that reason,

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot activation meeting on IRC - Tuesday 16th March 19:00 UTC

Please announce such meetings with more than ~24 hours notice -- this has happened several times and while I recognize the pace of development on this issue I think that slotting a consensus meeting with less than 24 hours is inappropriate. I think we should proactively postpone it a week so that

[bitcoin-dev] Taproot activation meeting on IRC - Tuesday 16th March 19:00 UTC

At the previous meeting, there was consensus for BIP8 activation parameters except for LOT, assuming a release around this time. Since then, a release has not occurred, and the new idea of Speedy Trial has been proposed to preempt the original/main activation plan. It's probably a good idea to