On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Why not use the single-show-signature scheme I came up with a while
> back on the Bitcoin side to force the bitcoin side to reveal a private
> key?
>
>
>
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Tier Nolan via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> That is very interesting.
>
> There has been some recent discussion about atomic cross chain transfers
> between Bitcoin and legacy altcoins. For this purpose a legacy altcoin is
> one
That is very interesting.
There has been some recent discussion about atomic cross chain transfers
between Bitcoin and legacy altcoins. For this purpose a legacy altcoin is
one that has strict IsStandard() rules and none of the advanced script
opcodes.
It has a requirement that Bob sends Alice
Congratulations!
It a property of the SKCP system that the person who performed the trusted
setup cannot extract any information from a proof?
In other words, is it proven hard to obtain information from a proof by the
buyer?
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <
I am happy to announce the first successful Zero-Knowledge Contingent
Payment (ZKCP) on the Bitcoin network.
ZKCP is a transaction protocol that allows a buyer to purchase
information from a seller using Bitcoin in a manner which is private,
scalable, secure, and which doesn’t require trusting