Re: [bitcoin-dev] Transaction Replacement by Fee

2017-01-28 Thread Andrew via bitcoin-dev
Hi, recently been trying to get RBF working on a multisig input. I set the nSequence to 0, but script didn't verify (used python-bitcoinlib). Should it work for this type of transaction? I am using the SignatureHash(...) method of signing, not rpc.signrawtransaction(...). Thanks On Thu, Jan 12, 2

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Transaction Replacement by Fee

2017-01-12 Thread Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 09:13:23AM -0500, Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev wrote: > BIP125 is the standard way to signal: > https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0125.mediawiki > > Should explain everything you need. Additionally some miners mine full replace-by-fee, which has no limitation

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Transaction Replacement by Fee

2017-01-12 Thread Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
BIP125 is the standard way to signal: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0125.mediawiki Should explain everything you need. On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Police Terror via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Hello, > > Where can I find the rules on trans

[bitcoin-dev] Transaction Replacement by Fee

2017-01-12 Thread Police Terror via bitcoin-dev
Hello, Where can I find the rules on transaction replacement? For instance what are the valid ranges for the sequence values in transaction inputs? Normally I set this value to MAX_UINT32, and the locktime to 0. Can I change the outputs? Can I add more inputs to pay a higher fee? Just looking f