On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 05:10:37PM +, alicexbt via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> > Bringing up Whirlpool here is silly. Everyone knows Samourai has made, at
> > best,
> > some rather insane technical decisions. Quite likely downright malicious
> > with
> > their xpub collection. Their o
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:14:47AM -1000, David A. Harding wrote:
> On 2023-01-10 00:06, Peter Todd wrote:
> > Remember, we'd like decentralized coinjoin implementations like
> > Joinmarket to
> > work. How does a decentralized coinjoin implement "conflict monitoring"?
>
> 1. Run a relay node with
Hi Peter,
> Bringing up Whirlpool here is silly. Everyone knows Samourai has made, at
> best,
> some rather insane technical decisions. Quite likely downright malicious with
> their xpub collection. Their opinion isn't relevant. Cite reputable sources.
I didn't want this thread to become a wasab
Hi Peter,
> ## How Full-RBF Mitigates the Double-Spend DoS Attack
>
> Modulo tx-pinning, full-rbf mitigates the double-spend DoS attack in a very
> straightforward way: the low fee transaction is replaced by the higher fee
> transaction, resulting in the latter getting mined in a reasonable amoun
On 2023-01-10 00:06, Peter Todd wrote:
Remember, we'd like decentralized coinjoin implementations like
Joinmarket to
work. How does a decentralized coinjoin implement "conflict
monitoring"?
1. Run a relay node with a conflict-detection patch. Stock Bitcoin Core
with -debug=mempoolrej will
On 2023-01-09 22:47, Peter Todd wrote:
How do you propose that the participants learn about the double-spend?
Without
knowing that it happened, they can't respond as you suggested.
I can think of various ways---many of them probably the same ideas that
would occur to you. More concise than li
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:02:35AM -1000, David A. Harding wrote:
> On 2023-01-09 22:47, Peter Todd wrote:
> > How do you propose that the participants learn about the double-spend?
> > Without
> > knowing that it happened, they can't respond as you suggested.
>
> I can think of various ways---man
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 09:19:39AM +, alicexbt wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> > ## How Full-RBF Mitigates the Double-Spend DoS Attack
> >
> > Modulo tx-pinning, full-rbf mitigates the double-spend DoS attack in a very
> > straightforward way: the low fee transaction is replaced by the higher fee
> >
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 09:11:46PM -1000, David A. Harding wrote:
> On 2023-01-09 12:18, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > [The quote:]
> >
> > "Does fullrbf offer any benefits other than breaking zeroconf
> > business
> > practices?"
> >
> > ...has caused a lot of confusion by imply
On 2023-01-09 12:18, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
[The quote:]
"Does fullrbf offer any benefits other than breaking zeroconf
business
practices?"
...has caused a lot of confusion by implying that there were no
benefits. [...]
tl;dr: without full-rbf people can intentionally a
I was reminded recently that while Suhas Daftuar cited tx-pinning as a reason
to remove full-rbf, he neglected to mention that tx-pinning greatly increases
the cost of attacks on multi-party protocols. Him (rhetorically?) asking(4):
"Does fullrbf offer any benefits other than breaking zeroconf
11 matches
Mail list logo
