Hi woltx,
> I've been reviewing joinstr, and if I understand the code correctly, the
> cryptographic scheme mentioned as an alternative to blind signatures isn't
> implemented yet, is it? Currently, it seems that anyone can submit unrelated
> inputs and outputs.
Thanks for reviewing joinstr. Y
Hi /dev/fd0,
I've been reviewing joinstr, and if I understand the code correctly, the
cryptographic scheme mentioned as an alternative to blind signatures isn't
implemented yet, is it? Currently, it seems that anyone can submit unrelated
inputs and outputs.
Perhaps PR #24058 (https://github.co
Hi Max,
There a few DoS vectors that need to be fixed. Its just a proof of concept that
I wanted to share with everyone to get feedback which could be improved over
time. There is also a warning at the bottom of README to not use this on
mainnet as it might have bugs.
I will continue the devel
Great to see an implementation of the idea.
Maybe I misunderstand, but isn't there a vulnerability of denial of service
here?
A user who registers one input will receive the round secret identifier, and
this is all the information required for output registration. However, that
malicious user
Hi Bitcoin Developers,
I have written a python script as proof of concept for the [coinjoin
implementation][1] using [nostr][2]. I used a lot of Python scripts created by
others in school, so it feels nice to offer something that could be useful to
others.
The implementation uses Bitcoin Core
