On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 03:20:42AM +0800, Johnson Lau wrote:
> >>> the fact that we do this has a rather odd result: a transaction spending
> >>> a witness output with an unknown version is valid even if the transaction
> >>> doesn’t have any witnesses!
> >>
> >> I don’t see any reason to have s
>
>>> the fact that we do this has a rather odd result: a transaction spending a
>>> witness output with an unknown version is valid even if the transaction
>>> doesn’t have any witnesses!
>>
>> I don’t see any reason to have such check. We simply leave unknown witness
>> program as any-one-c
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:22:45AM +0800, Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Thanks for Peter Todd’s detailed report:
> https://petertodd.org/2016/segwit-consensus-critical-code-review
>
> I have the following response.
>
> >Since the reserve value is only a single, 32-byte value, we’re setting
Thanks for Peter Todd’s detailed report:
https://petertodd.org/2016/segwit-consensus-critical-code-review
I have the following response.
>Since the reserve value is only a single, 32-byte value, we’re setting
>ourselves up for the same problem again7.
Please note that unlimited space has been r
