Re: [bitcoin-dev] Generalised Replay Protection for Future Hard Forks

2017-11-08 Thread Mats Jerratsch via bitcoin-dev
Hey Jacob! > Take the specific and common case of non-upgraded wallet software. Suppose a > HF happens, and becomes the network used by 90% of users. Will old wallets > still default to the old nForkId (10% legacy chain)? If so, I'd expect a lot > of accidental mis-sends on that chain.

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Centralizing mining by force

2017-11-08 Thread ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
Good morning Robert, What you describe is precisely one possible result of a 51% attack. At below the 50% threshold, miners outside the cartel will on average outrace miners inside the cartel, so fullnodes which do not follow cartel rules will reject them as per Nakamoto Consensus. At some

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Centralizing mining by force

2017-11-08 Thread Marc Bevand via bitcoin-dev
What you describe is an example of a majority attack ("51% attack"). No technical mechanism in Bitcoin prevents this. However in practice, miners are not incentivized to perform this attack as it would destroy confidence in Bitcoin, and would ultimately impact their revenues. -Marc On Mon, Nov