Hi all,
The following are some notes I took during Breaking Bitcoin 2019, selected
for relevance. Any mistakes are most likely my own.
Carl Dong gave an excellent talk on guix as a replacement for the gitian
build system:
But using the testnet means that you actually need to deal with resets.
There were 2 resets in the past but the last was in 2011.
Am 09.06.19 um 16:55 schrieb Tim Menapace:
>I don't get why the testnet shouldn't be >resetted just because there is
>a (probably better) alternative for it. The
>I don't get why the testnet shouldn't be >resetted just because there is
>a (probably better) alternative for it. The >testnet is still a thing and
>is also used.
Like Bryan said, lot of miners test here. E.g. new firmware versions, hardware
prototypes and operation services. Difficulty will
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 02:46:54PM +0930, Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Matt Corallo writes:
> > 2) wrt rule 4, I'd like to see a calculation of worst-case free
> > relay. I think we're already not in a great place, but maybe it's
> > worth it or maybe there is some other way to reduce
In an earlier post [1] I suggested an approach to create native Bitcoin
contracts that reduce mining's income volatility and received very helpful
comments on implementation from Pieter Wuille [2] and Natanael [3]
After processing those comments I instead suggest the following restricted
I don't get why the testnet shouldn't be resetted just because there is
a (probably better) alternative for it. The testnet is still a thing and
is also used.
Am 08.06.19 um 16:21 schrieb Bryan Bishop:
Be greeted Emil,
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 9:21 AM Emil Engler via bitcoin-dev
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 11:59 PM Rusty Russell wrote:
> "Russell O'Connor" writes:
> > Hi Rusty,
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 9:21 AM Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev <
> > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> >> The new "emergency RBF" rule:
> >>
> >> 6. If the original
Matt Corallo writes:
> I think this needs significantly improved motivation/description. A few areas
> I'd like to see calculated out:
>
> 1) wrt rule 3, for this to be
> obviously-incentive-compatible-for-the-next-miner, I'd think no evicted
> transactions would be allowed to be in the next
"Russell O'Connor" writes:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 9:21 AM Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> The new "emergency RBF" rule:
>>
>> 6. If the original transaction was not in the first 4,000,000 weight
>> units of the fee-ordered
