Good morning Luke,
> > Another point to ponder is test modes.
> > In mass production you need test modes.
>
> > (Sure, an attacker can try targeted ESD at the `TESTMODE` flip-flop
> > repeatedly, but this risks also flipping other scan flip-flops that contain
> > the data that is being
(cc'ing over to libre-soc-dev)
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-February/018392.html
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 8:21 AM ZmnSCPxj wrote:
> > i was stunned to learn that in a 28nm ASIC, 50% of it is repeater-buffers!
>
> Well, that surprises me as well.
> [...]
> So I
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 3:01 PM Bryan Bishop wrote:
> I don't see what you're talking about? None of your February emails
> were sent to ozlabs according to the archives there. Threads for the
> bitcoin-dev mailing list are stored here:
>
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 12:43:57PM +, Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> https://old.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/lcjhl6/taproot_activation_pools_will_be_able_to_veto/gm2l02w/
> [...]
> F6) It is more important that no rules that harm users are deployed
> than it is that new useful
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 4:18 AM Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> ... actually i don't see them in the bounces. what's happening there?
>
> On Saturday, February 13, 2021, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <
> l...@lkcl.net> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 6:10 AM ZmnSCPxj
> wrote:
> >> Good
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 6:10 AM ZmnSCPxj wrote:
>
> Good morning Luke,
morning - can i ask you a favour because moderated (off-topic)
messages are being forwarded
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev-moderation/
could you send these instead to libre-soc-...@lists.libre-soc.org?
many
