On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> I just tagged the git tree: v0.4.00rc2
Signed builds up at sourceforge:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.4.0/test/
--
Jeff Garzik
exMULTI, Inc.
jgar...@exmulti.com
--
> Darn good question. If the protection fails, would it be better for it
> to 'fail hard', leaving people complaining "bitcoin won't stay
> connected!"
>
> Or fail soft, so you at least have a couple of connections.
>
> I think fail hard is better-- we'll immediately know about the
> problem, and
2 matches
Mail list logo