Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mac libboost_thread or thread-mt?

2011-10-05 Thread Douglas Huff
Bad update. Macports has a couple of boost packages. Install the newer 1.46 ones. -- Douglas Huff On Oct 5, 2011 1:43 PM, "Gavin Andresen" wrote: > I updated src/makefile.osx and doc/build-osx.txt today, assuming that > the MacPorts versions of dependencies will be used and the -mt boost > libra

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mac libboost_thread or thread-mt?

2011-10-05 Thread Gavin Andresen
I updated src/makefile.osx and doc/build-osx.txt today, assuming that the MacPorts versions of dependencies will be used and the -mt boost libraries will be used. I also modified makefile.unix and makefile.osx to auto-build dependencies using gcc's -MMD option. -- -- Gavin Andresen -

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Transaction Delivery and Storage

2011-10-05 Thread Mike Hearn
I imagine a lot of the things on the contracts page will be implemented by specialized software that interacts with the Bitcoin network directly. Transactions would then be moved around, for example, by having clients do HTTP POSTs of protocol buffers to servers that are listening and know how to i

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mac libboost_thread or thread-mt?

2011-10-05 Thread Matt Corallo
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 16:40 -0700, Brian McQueen wrote: > I installed boost via the mac ports. Its got lobboost_thread-mt, but > it doesn't have libboost_thread.a. Should I modify the makefile or get > a different version of boost? > (from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2293962/boost-librari

Re: [Bitcoin-development] vtxPrev

2011-10-05 Thread Michael Grønager
Oups - I was reading the code wrongly - going through AddSupportingTransactions carefully again... The vtxPrev contains a list of the supporting confirmations up to 3 confirmations back. So it is only of relevance (and only gets filled) if you accept coins that are less than 3 confirmations old

Re: [Bitcoin-development] vtxPrev

2011-10-05 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Michael Grønager wrote: > The vtxPrev stores 3 transactions back, but as transactions need 7 block to > maturity and respendability isn't it overkill - I mean it is highly unlikely > that a transaction gets invalid after 7 confirmations and They don't need 7 bloc

[Bitcoin-development] vtxPrev

2011-10-05 Thread Michael Grønager
Hi ! I am looking into enabling a split between thin clients holding the wallet and server(s) holding the blocks and txdb. To that end I am considering to simplify the WalletTx a bit and I came across the vtxPrev in the code. As I see it vtxPrev is only used for keeping a list of supporting tr