On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 03:34:28AM +0100, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Things that need attention:
> * Do all client implementations support it?
To help in testing this: this address corresponds to a compressed
public key:
http://blockexplorer.com/testnet/address/mwUyUCWRp9WqyNgrGAbghs7K
Gavin,
I try to reproduce the error by doing this (Ubuntu 11.10 64bits):
rm -rf ~/bitcoin # CAUTION
./bitcoin-0.4.0-linux/bin/64/bitcoin
* Encrypt my wallet
* Close Bitcoin 0.4.0
Next open Bitcoin 0.5.0rc7:
./bitcoin-0.5.0rc7-linux/bin/64/bitcoin-qt
* Automatic wallet upgrade (I guess)
It has been a busy month; here's what I'm thinking about:
• It's great to get 0.5 out; congratulations to Wladimir for doing a
great job with the new GUI.
• The wallet encryption bug was embarrassing and stressful, and chewed
up a lot of my time over the past couple of weeks. Bugs happen, but
I'v
On Monday, November 21, 2011 8:06:27 PM Gavin Andresen wrote:
> Finding the money to hire some professional QA people to help create
> test plans and then execute them (the test plans, not the QA people)
> is one possible answer.
Not prioritizing some unannounced "release schedule" over getting bu
4 matches
Mail list logo