There are other issues besides IP address anonymization that would
need to be addressed. I'm sure at least a good number of you have read
http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.4524 and have seen Dan Kaminsky's
slideshows.
i.e. all fund aggregations (transactions with multiple inputs using
different public key
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 3:49:16 PM Gavin Andresen wrote:
> I've been busy pulling patches into git HEAD for a Bitcoin version
> 0.6, with the goal of having a Release Candidate 1 out in a couple of
> weeks.
I've rebuilt my 'next' and 'next-test' branches...
git://gitorious.org/~Luke-Jr/b
OK, give me a shout on IRC. It is a lot of work though, so be prepared. Bring
bags of patience :)
From: Luke-Jr
To: Amir Taaki
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 1:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP language on normative behavior
On Tuesday, Dece
A few weeks back I was in discussion with the IANA on getting a bitcoin URI
accepted in the standard. As a prerequisite I had to read 5 huge documents. I
did not end up writing that RFC.
Skilled developers have even less time than I do. While this particular RFC is
really nice for keeping ambig
> Developers could even choose to integrate Tor functionality into the
> client itself at some point.
>
The "satoshi" bitcoin client already supports use over TOR with the proxy
option - I think this was something Satoshi made regular use of.
---
--
Write once. Port to many.
Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create
new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the
Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. app
FYI for anybody who doesn't hang out in IRC:
I've been busy pulling patches into git HEAD for a Bitcoin version
0.6, with the goal of having a Release Candidate 1 out in a couple of
weeks.
So if you've done all your Christmas shopping and have time to help
test, code review, etc. now would be the
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 10:10:23 +0100
Wladimir wrote:
> Probably would need to package the block chain with it, as downloading that
> over Tor takes ages and causes unnecessary load on the network...
I actually started a freenet plugin for blockchain distribution in summer
(first rough steps only)
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Jordan Mack wrote:
> On 12/18/2011 1:19 PM, Stefan Thomas wrote:
> > Let those who want anonymity connect through Tor, Freenet, etc. It's
> > easy to add anonymity via an extra layer, but it is impossible to add
> > performance on top of a slow system.
>
> That
9 matches
Mail list logo
