It may be a political issue, but I don't think wikipedia becomes a
political organization for being against censorship.
This is not about left or right. Is about free speech, one of the
basic principles not only of freedom but also of democracy.
And as Gregory shows it clearly affects bitcoin direc
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Kyle Henderson wrote:
> For those that believe one particularly noisy country in the North America
> region with a policy called SOPA or PIPA directly affects Bitcoin - can you
> point out precisely where it does so?
In addition to the concerns about internet free
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> There are always issues that raise ire and moral outrage. I would
> rather that bitcoin.org stay apolitical -- our users will appreciate
> this in the long run.
>
>
Agreed :)
For those that believe one particularly noisy country in the No
I think that bitcoin.org should remain apolitical. However maybe it
would be good if the blackout to take effect on bitcointalk.org if
theymos and Sirius believes it is appropriate.
Bitcoin.org should provide bitcoin.
On 17/01/2012 11:59 AM, slush wrote:
> I agree Bitcoin should avoid ma
On Monday, January 16, 2012 7:46:39 PM Alan Reiner wrote:
> In response to Jeff and Luke-Jr, I don't see how this is /just any other
> poltical issue/. It strikes at the heart of everything Bitcoin is about.
Sorry, Bitcoin is not about the same thing to everyone. For me, Bitcoin is
about one thi
> I agree Bitcoin should avoid making any bold political stands.
I agree on this. Please don't turn Bitcoin project/homepage into some
political agitation. Not everybody care about political attitude of main
project developers.
slush
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Alan Reiner wrote:
> **
>
You guys are representing both extremes of the issue. In response to
Jeff and Luke-Jr, I don't see how this is /just any other poltical
issue/. It strikes at the heart of everything Bitcoin is about.
Barring Bitcoin-specific legislation, I don't see how any legislation
could be more relevant
Bunk argument. This is an issue that affects bitcoin directly.
Wikipedia has far more need to remain neutral and apolitical than bitcoin ever
does- you've read Satoshi's politically charged whitepaper or seen the genesis
block quote.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Action
Your approach won't work-- OP_ADD is limited to 4-byte operands. Changing
that would require a "hard" blockchain split / entire-network-upgrade.
I wish to submit the following draft BIP for discussion and possible
> formal BIP review.
>
> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_M_of_2_DRAFT
>
> It is a pr
Mushoz makes a good point:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=58450.msg695052#msg695052
Do we have enough downloads on 0.5.2rc1 to get the final rushed out and onto
the website?
--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar
Hi everyone,
I wish to submit the following draft BIP for discussion and possible
formal BIP review.
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_M_of_2_DRAFT
It is a proposed alternative to BIP 16 ("/P2SH/").
Thank you,
Ben Reeves
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Wladimir wrote:
> > Internet censorship *is* a threat to bitcoin, if we don't stand up for
> our
> > rights now we deserve anything that is coming. There will be no "long
> run".
>
> Very few people actual
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Wladimir wrote:
> Internet censorship *is* a threat to bitcoin, if we don't stand up for our
> rights now we deserve anything that is coming. There will be no "long run".
Very few people actually care if they can load that particular URL ...
if you were talking ab
13 matches
Mail list logo
