Re: [Bitcoin-development] Announcement: libcoin

2012-04-14 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
Guys! Only for the record, I'll integrate BitcoinJS (app) into Diaspora and, the server side will be based on libcoin! Of course, this code will be part of Diaspora and every single Diaspora* Pod will be able to host its own users's wallets... ;-) I appreciate any help during this development!

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin TX fill-or-kill deterministic behavior

2012-04-14 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote: > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 04:20:50PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> Some HTTP derivative would probably make life easier for mobile >> payments and firewalled scenarios, and for client->merchant >> communications, for instance. > > Have you ever

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin TX fill-or-kill deterministic behavior

2012-04-14 Thread Pieter Wuille
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 04:20:50PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> Furthermore, many of these ideas -- like sending TX's directly to the > >> merchant -- involve far more direct payee<->payer communication on the > >> part of the wallet client than is currently envisioned > > > > Yes, though it's wo

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin TX fill-or-kill deterministic behavior

2012-04-14 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Mike Hearn wrote: >> So, to be specific... a A->B chain of transactions, that collectively >> meet the network's fee requirements? > > Yes. ACK on the concept >> Ideally the fee, if any, is market based and negotiated. Problem is... like >> democracy, no matter

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin TX fill-or-kill deterministic behavior

2012-04-14 Thread Mike Hearn
> So, to be specific... a A->B chain of transactions, that collectively > meet the network's fee requirements? Yes. > Ideally the fee, if any, is market based and negotiated. Problem is... like > democracy, no matter how ugly it is, people have trouble finding a > better system :) I think this i