Re: [Bitcoin-development] Punishing empty blocks?

2012-05-25 Thread Alan Reiner
I like the concept except that it only works if every node connected to the miner enforces the rule (if it works). Once any one of the nodes forwards the block, other nodes see it coming from a node that can pass the challenge. I don't think any solution based on node queries will succeed,

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Punishing empty blocks?

2012-05-25 Thread Peter Vessenes
We just implemented our own mining tool, soup-to-nuts, and I would say that the likely motivation for what I presume are botnet owners is just economic. It's a lot more work to make sure your merkleing and keeping up-to-date are happening than it is to just get an 80 byte header from a central

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Punishing empty blocks?

2012-05-25 Thread Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn
For what it is worth, I question whether this is a problem. Or, I guess I question whether the best solution to it isn't for people to start including more transaction fees. In fact, I'm not entirely sure that this problem doesn't actually *encourage* people to that solution, which would be very