- Forwarded message from Pieter Wuille pieter.wui...@gmail.com -
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 01:10:54 +0200
From: Pieter Wuille pieter.wui...@gmail.com
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: getmemorypool
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Hello everyone,
Luke's
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net wrote:
I remember some people, Greg in particular, who were not a fan of
approach (2) at all, though it has the benefit of speeding startup for
new users as there's no indexing overhead.
I'm not a fan of anything which introduces
I think the sourceforge mailing list system had the hiccups this
weekend; sorry for Pieter's messages appearing in your inbox multiple
times, it is not his fault.
I deleted the extra copies from the mailing list archives.
As for the contents of his message, since this mailing list was not
Actual BDB files are absolutely not deterministic. Nor is the raw
blockchain itself currently, because blocks aren't always added in the
same order (plus they get orphans in them)
That's true. Though if you prune up to the last checkpoint, orphans
before that point can be safely thrown away.
4 matches
Mail list logo
