while perfectly true for now, hopefully that won't remain the case as we
get people on board with testing. ...ok, sure, it might be a while... but
having the separate list with help with archival type stuff and other
things eventually. we'll see how useful it actually is in time.
Arklan
-
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Arklan Uth Oslin
wrote:
> i'll second the bitcoin test list.
As you like, but... bitcoin-devel is quite low traffic, so there is
not exactly an issue of crowding. And a separate list means people
cannot chime in as easily.
--
Jeff Garzik
exMULTI, Inc.
jgar...@e
i'll second the bitcoin test list.
Arklan
--
As long as there is light, the darkness holds no fear. And yet, even in the
deepest black, there is life. - Arklan Uth Oslin
I want to leave this world the same way I came into it: backwards and on
fire. - Arklan Uth Oslin
On Thu, Oct 11, 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 11/10/2012 16:46, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> Any progress on a release candidate QA sanity testing plan?
essentially yes - in all seriousness, I have come around to your way
of thinking, it is not worth arguing about. we end up in the same place
I'd emailed steve last week to try and get a look at the test cases and
such he worked up, but I've not heard from him. Other then that, I'll grab
the RC tonight and go through it.
Arklan
--
As long as there is light, the darkness holds no fear. And yet, even in the
deepest black, there i
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Gavin Andresen
wrote:
> Any progress on a release candidate QA sanity testing plan?
Posted a call for testing in this forum thread,
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=117487.0
--
Jeff Garzik
exMULTI, Inc.
jgar...@exmulti.com
--
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Wladimir wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Proposal: following 0.7.1 release, freeze the tree. Do not pull
>> anything, until ultraprune is pulled (or rejected, but I think the
>> latter is unlikely).
>
> Yes, I think this is a goo
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Proposal: following 0.7.1 release, freeze the tree. Do not pull
> anything, until ultraprune is pulled (or rejected, but I think the
> latter is unlikely).
Yes, I think this is a good idea. Getting ultraprune in should be a priority.
I've j
8 matches
Mail list logo
