Re: [Bitcoin-development] Public key and signature malleability

2012-10-21 Thread Wladimir
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Pieter Wuille pieter.wui...@gmail.com wrote: In order to make the Bitcoin network rules more well-defined, I'd like to propose strict rules about what is acceptable, and which do not depend on OpenSSL's implementation. I strongly support this too. It is good to

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Public key and signature malleability

2012-10-21 Thread Gavin Andresen
Any objections from other transaction-validating implementations? I strongly support more precisely defining the transaction validity rules by changing the reference implementation. -- -- Gavin Andresen -- Everyone

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Public key and signature malleability

2012-10-21 Thread Mike Hearn
No objections. On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Gavin Andresen gavinandre...@gmail.com wrote: Any objections from other transaction-validating implementations? I strongly support more precisely defining the transaction validity rules by changing the reference implementation. -- -- Gavin

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Public key and signature malleability

2012-10-21 Thread Stefan Thomas
Any objections from other transaction-validating implementations? Sounds good to me. I think it's important to give people a chance to fix their software, but Pieter's proposal does that. On 10/21/2012 7:05 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote: Any objections from other transaction-validating