On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Pieter Wuille pieter.wui...@gmail.com wrote:
In order to make the Bitcoin network rules more well-defined, I'd like
to propose strict rules about what is acceptable, and which do not
depend on OpenSSL's implementation.
I strongly support this too. It is good to
Any objections from other transaction-validating implementations?
I strongly support more precisely defining the transaction validity
rules by changing the reference implementation.
--
--
Gavin Andresen
--
Everyone
No objections.
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Gavin Andresen gavinandre...@gmail.com wrote:
Any objections from other transaction-validating implementations?
I strongly support more precisely defining the transaction validity
rules by changing the reference implementation.
--
--
Gavin
Any objections from other transaction-validating implementations?
Sounds good to me. I think it's important to give people a chance to fix
their software, but Pieter's proposal does that.
On 10/21/2012 7:05 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote:
Any objections from other transaction-validating
4 matches
Mail list logo