On Saturday, February 09, 2013 2:33:25 PM Timo Hanke wrote:
> > Why don't you use namecoin or another alt-chain for this?
>
> Because namcoin tries to solve a different problem, DNS, whereas I want
> to establish an identity for a payment protocol.
What is the technical difference here? Namecoin
Bitcoin version 0.8.0 release candidate 1 is now available from:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.8.0/test
This is a major release designed to improve performance and handle the
increasing volume of transactions on the network.
Please report bugs using the issue t
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:01:08AM -0500, Peter Todd wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:03:54AM +0100, Timo Hanke wrote:
> > First, we have drafted a quite general specification for bitcoin
> > certificates (protobuf messages) that allow for a variety of payment
> > protocols (e.g. static as wel
I have done test builds on FreeBSD.
Clean builds using gcc and clang, building both the qt gui and the command
line daemon, and the tests run clean as well. The qt gui runs, and cleanly
reindexed and caught up. I have no problems to report.
I am not doing any adjustments apart from applying the n
4 matches
Mail list logo
