Do you have a specific use case in mind?
Maybe - if you have a percentage slider like with humble bundles you can
make it more explicit what part went where?
In any case, if you're really interested in this you need to write a new
BIP that extends 21. Any syntax will do does not help in
On 21 May 2013 01:59, Mark Friedenbach m...@monetize.io wrote:
At the developer round-table it was asked if the payment protocol would
alt-chains, and Gavin noted that it has a UTF-8 encoded string
identifying the network (main or test). As someone with two
proposals in the works which also
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Melvin Carvalho
melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote:
Some out of band algo/hash could work so long as there was a one to one
relationship between the described object and the UUID. In this case the
gensis block may not uniquely identify a coin.
What does this mean?
On 22 May 2013 16:07, Jeff Garzik jgar...@exmulti.com wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Melvin Carvalho
melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote:
Some out of band algo/hash could work so long as there was a one to one
relationship between the described object and the UUID. In this case the
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Melvin Carvalho
melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 May 2013 16:07, Jeff Garzik jgar...@exmulti.com wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Melvin Carvalho
melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote:
Some out of band algo/hash could work so long as there was a one to
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 2:20:22 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Melvin Carvalho
melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 May 2013 16:07, Jeff Garzik jgar...@exmulti.com wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Melvin Carvalho
melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org wrote:
In some cases, multiple currencies can use the same blockchain (not just the
singular genesis block). This use case *is* something we want to encourage -
no reason for people to make an entirely new blockchain if their altcoin
Getting back to the original proposal:
RE: uuid instead of main / test in the payment protocol:
I vote no.
The payment protocol will become at least 3 BIPs:
1) Protocol messages (current gist, essentially)
2) MIME type
3) bitcoin: URI extension
An alt coin will need its own version of (2) and
You can pull use cases out of thin air. Humble Bundle is a perfect example.
BIP 0001 instructed me to introduce the idea here before performing the labor
of writing a new BIP. If others reply in support then the labor will be
justified.
The intended purpose is to give users the simplest way to
bitcoin:address[:amount][/label][;address[:amount][/labe
l]][?message=message]
Correction:
bitcoin:[label/]address[:amount][;[label/]address[:amount]][?message=message]
--
Try New Relic Now We'll Send You this Cool
10 matches
Mail list logo
