Re: [Bitcoin-development] Feedback requested: "reject" p2p message

Thanks for the feedback, everybody, gist updated: https://gist.github.com/gavinandresen/7079034 Categories are: 0x01-0x0fProtocol syntax errors0x10-0x1fProtocol semantic errors0x40-0x4fServer policy rule

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Payment protocol for onion URLs.

Just an aside... The 1BTC bountry John references below is a 1BTC P2SH output, where the redeemScript he provided does hash to the expected value, and is itself a 2-of-3 multisig, with the following pubkeys, expressed as addresses: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj 1FCYd7j4CThTMzts78rh6iQJLB

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Payment protocol for onion URLs.

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Adam Back wrote: > Maybe I voice this opinion a bit late in the cycle, but A bit late is one way to put it. All these topics and more were discussed to death a year ago when the payment protocol was first being designed. Bluntly, I think we're all sick of i

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Payment protocol for onion URLs.

I think its a mistake relying directly on X509, its subject to corrpution attacks, involves ASN.1 and enough openSSL X.500 encoding abiguity (or other code base) to be a security nightmare. Why not make the payment messages signed by bitcoin keys. If someone wants to associate with X.509 they can

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Feedback requested: "reject" p2p message

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 2:26 AM, Andreas Schildbach wrote: > HTTP also defines success codes (2xx). Are we also talking about ACK > messages now, rather than just REJECT messages? I do not believe we should do that: It would be a non-trivial increase the protocol bandwidth requirements. ---

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Feedback requested: "reject" p2p message

HTTP also defines success codes (2xx). Are we also talking about ACK messages now, rather than just REJECT messages? On 10/28/2013 03:52 AM, kjj wrote: > Any reason not to use actual HTTP codes? I'm not aware of any major > deficiency in them. Most of them won't apply to us, which is fine, they

[Bitcoin-development] 0.8.5 setup.exe is corrupt

I downloaded 0.8.5 windows setup .exe and it says it is corrupted even after i try re-download it maybe it needs to be rearchived? -- October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate appli

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Making fee estimation better

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Gavin Andresen wrote: > I feel like there is a lot of "in the weeds" discussion here about > theoretical, what-if-this-and-that-happens-in-the-future scenarios. > > I would just like to point out (again) that this i