[Bitcoin-development] bitcoin 1.x & 0.x in parallel (Re: is there a way to do bitcoin-staging?)

2013-11-21 Thread Adam Back
Yeah but that sounds pretty much like test-net and starts a new digital scarcity on an alpha-qa level network, with an implied promise that maybe if you're lucky your coins might survive the alpha testing and have some value. I'm not talking about some slightly stabler version of test-net. Probab

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Who or what is /Satoshi:0.8.99/Gangnam Style:2.1/ ?

2013-11-21 Thread Matt Corallo
No, mine identifies as BitcoinJ, RelayNode, version string On 11/21/2013 10:27 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Is that Matt's relay, which has reduced validity checking? > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Mike Hearn wrote: >> I added some additional logging to my node and ran it for a few days. >>

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Who or what is /Satoshi:0.8.99/Gangnam Style:2.1/ ?

2013-11-21 Thread Mike Hearn
Thanks. By the way, your bitnodes site is excellent. Thanks for doing that. If you're in the mood for extending it, it'd be great to gather and chart data on block and tx propagation times. Do you think the recent explosion in running nodes is real, or due to some kind of custom experimental thing

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Who or what is /Satoshi:0.8.99/Gangnam Style:2.1/ ?

2013-11-21 Thread Addy Yeow
Try https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=19897? On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Mike Hearn wrote: > I added some additional logging to my node and ran it for a few days. > There's a pull req open for my extra logging, it is quite trivial. Here's > what it looks like: > > 2013-

Re: [Bitcoin-development] is there a way to do bitcoin-staging?

2013-11-21 Thread Melvin Carvalho
On 14 October 2013 20:08, Adam Back wrote: > Coming back to the staging idea, maybe this is a realistic model that could > work. The objective being to provide a way for bitcoin to move to a live > beta and stable being worked on in parallel like fedora vs RHEL or odd/even > linux kernel version

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Who or what is /Satoshi:0.8.99/Gangnam Style:2.1/ ?

2013-11-21 Thread Jeff Garzik
Is that Matt's relay, which has reduced validity checking? On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Mike Hearn wrote: > I added some additional logging to my node and ran it for a few days. > There's a pull req open for my extra logging, it is quite trivial. Here's > what it looks like: > > 2013-11-21 1

Re: [Bitcoin-development] is there a way to do bitcoin-staging?

2013-11-21 Thread coinscoins
looks like Betacoin is already here - http://betacoin.org -- Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers st

[Bitcoin-development] Who or what is /Satoshi:0.8.99/Gangnam Style:2.1/ ?

2013-11-21 Thread Mike Hearn
I added some additional logging to my node and ran it for a few days. There's a pull req open for my extra logging, it is quite trivial. Here's what it looks like: 2013-11-21 13:41:04 AcceptToMemoryPool: 5.9.24.81:7834/Satoshi:0.8.99/Gangnam Style:2.1/ : accepted 2d1bbcc2bf64dfcb57a2f0180b2607a48a

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Who or what is /Satoshi:0.8.99/Gangnam Style:2.1/ ?

2013-11-21 Thread Arthur Gervais
Hello Mike, You can see the three nodes from nogleg on https://blockchain.info/hub-nodes. They also relay the most to blockchain.info. Arthur On 21/11/13 14:55, Addy Yeow wrote: > Try https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=19897? > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Mike H