Works fine for me
; <<>> DiG 9.8.1-P1 <<>> ANY testnet-seed.bitcoin.petertodd.org
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 40809
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 22, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;testnet-seed.bitcoin.pete
Thanks for looking at the issue.
Unfortunately, it still fails for me:
$ nslookup testnet-seed.bitcoin.petertodd.org
Server: 127.0.1.1
Address:127.0.1.1#53
** server can't find testnet-seed.bitcoin.petertodd.org: SERVFAIL
Like I said, can you look at the logfiles how the request
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Although this is a somewhat appealing notion, would it really improve
> feature velocity? I don't think the current p2p protocol is holding anything
> back, and having to implement features twice in two protocols would slow
> things down quite a
>
> There
> is no need to have Bitcoin transport all using a single protocol, and
> we can get better robustness and feature velocity if there are a
> couple protocols in use (you could just run a block-transport-protocol
> daemon that connects to your local node via the classic protocol).
Althou
4 matches
Mail list logo
