[Bitcoin-development] What is the danger if bitcoind startted with -flushwallet=false ?

Hi everybody, I tried to reduce the IO of bitcoind, and I found '-flushwallet=false'. After trying it, my IO reduced greatly. But why 'flushwallet' is true by default? Is there any danger if closing the flush wallet thread? I lost all my coins in testnet after one crash with '-flushwal

[Bitcoin-development] Another weird transaction question...

Hey all, Sorry to keep bugging you all, as I slowly verify the blockchain one transaction after another with my own implementation, but I have found another transaction that is obviously correct (as it is verified by the legit client) that has me seeking clarification. This multisig output scr

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Another weird transaction question...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 13 August 2014 11:00:22 GMT-07:00, Richard Moore wrote: >Hey all, > >Sorry to keep bugging you all, as I slowly verify the blockchain one >transaction after another with my own implementation, but I have found >another transaction that is obvio

Re: [Bitcoin-development] What is the danger if bitcoind startted with -flushwallet=false ?

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:22 PM, 潘庆庆 wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I tried to reduce the IO of bitcoind, and I found '-flushwallet=false'. > After trying it, my IO reduced greatly. > But why 'flushwallet' is true by default? Is there any danger if closing > the flush wallet thread? > I