On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 10:03:20AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> That claim is horse manure :) He never signed private emails sent to
> me, nor the forum posts.
That's consistent with what everyone else is saying:
https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/509614729879642113
> He -might- have signed
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> Changes: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/102/files
>
> Gregory, Jeff: does this address your concerns?
> Others: comments?
I've made another change in the PR, as language about strictly only
compressed or uncompressed public keys was mi
That claim is horse manure :) He never signed private emails sent to
me, nor the forum posts.
He -might- have signed the occasional thing related to releases, I'm not sure.
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Peter Todd wrote:
> So far I have zero evidence that the common claim that "Satoshi PGP
So far I have zero evidence that the common claim that "Satoshi PGP
signed everything" was true; I have no evidence he ever
cryptographically signed any communications at all.
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
0ce4f740fb700bb8a9ed859ac96ac9871567a20fca07f76a
signature.asc
Descriptio
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Mark van Cuijk wrote:
> If you do so, please make sure the length of the hash is included in the
> PaymentDetails/PaymentRequest. If someone parses the URI and doesn’t have an
> authenticated way of knowing the expected length of the hash, a MITM attacker
> can
5 matches
Mail list logo
