Re: [Bitcoin-development] Merged mining a side chain with proof of burn on parent chain

2014-12-16 Thread Tamas Blummer
The output has to be burned otherwise there is no cost of expressing any number of alternate opinions the same time. Tamas Blummer Bits of Proof On Dec 15, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Isidor Zeuner cryptocurrenc...@quidecco.de wrote: For every participant who could try to decide about the adequateness

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Merged mining a side chain with proof of burn on parent chain

2014-12-16 Thread Tamas Blummer
Let me be more concrete in implementation details: 1) burn transaction sends at least n satoshis to an OP_RETURN h, 2) h mod m matches the bitcoin block hash mod m, for the block the burn transaction was mined into. 3) The side chain block header hashes to h and also contains the bitcoin block

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Merged mining a side chain with proof of burn on parent chain

2014-12-16 Thread Peter Todd
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:55:50AM +0200, Alex Mizrahi wrote: Usually at this point people say we assume that miners aren't going to collude, otherwise even Bitcoin is not secure. Well, this is BS. The fact that a pool can acquire more than 50% of total hashpower was successfully demonstrated

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Open development processes and reddit charms

2014-12-16 Thread Troy Benjegerdes
Thank you Jeff. Having looked at a lot of linux code, and now a lot of bitcoin code, the biggest long-term systemic risk I see is that Bitcoin has is the lack of code janitors. The problem is that janitoring was *disruptive* for non-x86 linux architectures when it first got going, and it's

[Bitcoin-development] Setting the record straight on Proof-of-Publication

2014-12-16 Thread paul snow
Peter provides an excellent summary of Proof of Publication, which starts with defining it as being composed of a solution to the double spend problem. He requires Proof-of-receipt (proof every member of p in audience P has received a message m), Proof-of-non-publication (proof a message m has

Re: [Bitcoin-development] ACK NACK utACK Concept ACK

2014-12-16 Thread Btc Drak
Would someone also clarify the use of nit for nitpicking and how it plays in the role of consensus? It seems like it's used for minor complaints/preferences. Drak On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Jeff Garzik jgar...@bitpay.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Wladimir laa...@gmail.com

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Setting the record straight on Proof-of-Publication

2014-12-16 Thread odinn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 bleep bloop Peter Todd: On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 01:41:34PM +, odinn wrote: Peter... It kind of sounds to me that (as fine of a position paper as this is) on _certain_ points, you're falling prey to the but it's inefficient, but it's a