Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Protocol Specification

2014-07-08 Thread Chris D'Costa
This is probably the best, most complete resource available for those who don't want to (or don't know how to) wade through the code. Well done. On 7 July 2014 19:57, JMOlmos GMail wrote: > And for translation's facility :P > > > 2014-07-07 14:57 GMT-03:00 JMOlmos GMail : > >> And for translati

Re: [Bitcoin-development] "bits": Unit of account

2014-04-23 Thread Chris D'Costa
t has been mentioned here and elsewhere. I wonder in the long run if this will not just naturally occur anyway. Regards Chris D'Costa Email: chris_dco...@meek.io Sent from my iPhone > On 23 Apr 2014, at 11:56, Tamas Blummer wrote: > > The problem is µBTC that bit tries to solve.

Re: [Bitcoin-development] secure assigned bitcoin address directory

2014-04-01 Thread Chris D'Costa
Hi Daryl > My proposal leverages the existing SSL key system Ok I thought you were suggesting wrapping the URL in an additional PGP signature. -- ___ Bitcoin-development mailin

Re: [Bitcoin-development] secure assigned bitcoin address directory

2014-04-01 Thread Chris D'Costa
alled "signing parties", nowadays keys posted to a public forum by a known user, but it's not a standard and not ideal. Regards Chris D'Costa Sent from my iPhone > On 1 Apr 2014, at 20:16, Daryl Banttari wrote: > > I posted some code on Reddit a while back a

Re: [Bitcoin-development] secure assigned bitcoin address directory

2014-04-01 Thread Chris D'Costa
set, a new proof of life date and then the Bitcoin keys (BIP32) can be restored. Regards Chris D'Costa Sent from my iPhone > On 1 Apr 2014, at 13:32, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Re-reading this, even with the most recent message, is still isn't > clear _precisely_ how you

Re: [Bitcoin-development] secure assigned bitcoin address directory

2014-04-01 Thread Chris D'Costa
On 31 Mar 2014, at 20:57, Roy Badami wrote: > Is namecoin actively maintained these days? That's a very good quest. It was one of the reasons why we ruled out namecoin, but not the only one. Although in principle it is a similar concept to namecoin + PGP, in practice at least for our device, t

Re: [Bitcoin-development] secure assigned bitcoin address directory

2014-03-31 Thread Chris D'Costa
y - again this is in the details and probably more specific to the project. Regards Chris D'Costa > On 31 Mar 2014, at 13:46, Natanael wrote: > > This sounds like Namecoin. You can already register profiles with it, > including keypairs. onename.io is a web-based client you

Re: [Bitcoin-development] secure assigned bitcoin address directory

2014-03-31 Thread Chris D'Costa
efer to the "distributed ledger of device keys" as the "Web-of-trust re-imagined" although that isn't strictly true. Ok there you have it. The cat is out of the bag, feel free to give feedback, I have to finish the paper, apologies if it is not a topic for this list. Regar

[Bitcoin-development] Post to list request

2014-03-21 Thread Chris D'Costa
Hello I wonder if I could be granted access to post to the dev list. My project is the Meek hardware wallet, and we are working on a solution to avoid MITM attacks when communicating a pay-to information over a non-secure transport mechanism. Regards Chris --