Re: [Bitcoin-development] Request for review/testing: headers-first synchronization in Bitcoin Core

2014-10-12 Thread Geir Harald Hansen
On 12.10.2014 01:34, Pieter Wuille wrote: * No orphan blocks stored in memory anymore (reducing memory usage during sync). Will this slow down reorgs after a fork, compared to today? Regards, Geir H. Hansen, Bitminter

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version 0.7 release planning

2012-08-12 Thread Geir Harald Hansen
On 11.08.2012 20:56, Wladimir wrote: Duplicate strings are not a problem. Some strings are used multiple times in the program, and thus appear multiple times in the translation. This is because there are cases in which a string that is the same in English is translated differently in another

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version 0.7 release planning

2012-08-11 Thread Geir Harald Hansen
On 02.08.2012 18:43, Jeff Garzik wrote: There seems to be consensus that we should go ahead and do a release, before leveldb or ultraprune or anything major lands. There is no major landmark feature, but just a useful collection of small changes. It seems like a good time to Release Early,

Re: [Bitcoin-development] getmemorypool BIP process

2012-03-04 Thread Geir Harald Hansen
On 04.03.2012 02:04, Luke-Jr wrote: On Saturday, March 03, 2012 6:51:34 PM Geir Harald Hansen wrote: Long polling as currently implemented in pools has a race condition. Does the miner reconnect first or does another block change happen first? Double block changes are common with merged mining

Re: [Bitcoin-development] getmemorypool BIP process

2012-03-03 Thread Geir Harald Hansen
. It should be explained how target vs. fulltarget works. Perhaps some things should be optional for a client to implement? I think noncerange is of limited use and there's a good chance of getting the endianness wrong. Regards, Geir Harald Hansen