El 10/05/2015 06:07 p.m., Gregory Maxwell escribió:
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Sergio Lerner
sergioler...@certimix.com wrote:
Can the system by gamed?
Users can pay fees or a portion of fees out of band to miner(s); this
is undetectable to the network.
Then this is exactly what is
Why do so many tie the block size debate to creating a fee market, as if one
didn't already exist? Yes, today we frequently see many low priority
transactions included into the next block, but that does not mean there is not
a marketplace for block space. It just means miners are not being
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Sergio Lerner
sergioler...@certimix.com wrote:
Can the system by gamed?
Users can pay fees or a portion of fees out of band to miner(s); this
is undetectable to the network.
It's also behavior that miners have engaged in since at least 2011 (in
two forms;
Two years ago I presented a new way to create a fee market that does not
depend on the block chain limit.
This proposal has not been formally analyzed in any paper since then,
but I think it holds a good promise to untangle the current problem
regarding increasing the tps and creating the fee
4 matches
Mail list logo
