On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 7:42 PM, John Dillon
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Tier Nolan wrote:
> > Distributing headers with 1/64 of the standard POW means that a header
> would
> > be broadcast approximately once every 9 seconds (a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Tier Nolan wrote:
> Distributing headers with 1/64 of the standard POW means that a header would
> be broadcast approximately once every 9 seconds (assuming a 10 minute block
> time). This was picked because sendin
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Peter Todd wrote:
> Please provide equations and data justifying the 'magic constants' in
> this proposal.
>
The are a range of workable values. Ideally, there would first need to be
agreement on the general principle.
Distributing headers with 1/64 of the sta
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:27:03PM +0100, Tier Nolan wrote:
> I was thinking about a change to the rules for distinguishing between forks
> and maybe a BIP..
Please provide equations and data justifying the 'magic constants' in
this proposal.
Currently we do not relay blocks to peers if they conf
I was thinking about a change to the rules for distinguishing between forks
and maybe a BIP..
*Summary*
- Low POW headers should be broadcast by the network
If a header has more than 1/64 of the POW of a block, it should be
broadcast. This provides information on which fork is getting most of t
5 matches
Mail list logo
