Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Service bits for pruned nodes

2013-05-01 Thread Andy Parkins
On Wednesday 01 May 2013 15:26:57 Jeff Garzik wrote: > A generalized HTTP REST query protocol would be a nice addition... it > is just off-topic for this thread. On IRC yesterday, we discussed an > HTTP query interface like you suggested. It was agreed that it was a > nice interface, and might b

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Service bits for pruned nodes

2013-05-01 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Andy Parkins wrote: > On Tuesday 30 April 2013 21:11:47 Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> Hardly. The storage format is bitcoin protocol wire format, plus a >> tiny header. It is supported in multiple applications already, and is >> the most efficient storage format for bi

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Service bits for pruned nodes

2013-05-01 Thread Andy Parkins
On Tuesday 30 April 2013 21:11:47 Jeff Garzik wrote: > Hardly. The storage format is bitcoin protocol wire format, plus a > tiny header. It is supported in multiple applications already, and is > the most efficient storage format for bitcoin protocol blocks. "Most efficient" for what purpose?

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Service bits for pruned nodes

2013-04-30 Thread Simon Barber
And then the problem of what domain name to use - ideally a single name would be used so caches had the maximum chance to reuse content. To keep the network distributed perhaps the existing DNS seed mechanism could be used - a few names, each serving a random bitcoind's address. Put :8333 after

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Service bits for pruned nodes

2013-04-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Andy Parkins wrote: > On Tuesday 30 April 2013 19:04:59 Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> The format currently used by bitcoind would be just fine -- >> blocks/blk.dat for raw data, size-limited well below 1GB. Just >> need to add a small metadata download, and serve th

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Service bits for pruned nodes

2013-04-30 Thread Andy Parkins
On Tuesday 30 April 2013 19:04:59 Jeff Garzik wrote: > The format currently used by bitcoind would be just fine -- > blocks/blk.dat for raw data, size-limited well below 1GB. Just > need to add a small metadata download, and serve the raw block files. That doesn't seem very generic. It's ti

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Service bits for pruned nodes

2013-04-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Rebroad (sourceforge) wrote: > As part of a roadmap for block downloading, I think this may be a good time > to look into providing an HTTP/HTTPS protocol for block downloading - this > would also allow web proxies to cache blocks and thus make it more > accessibl

[Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Service bits for pruned nodes

2013-04-30 Thread Rebroad (sourceforge)
As part of a roadmap for block downloading, I think this may be a good time to look into providing an HTTP/HTTPS protocol for block downloading - this would also allow web proxies to cache blocks and thus make it more accessible, as well as cater for resumeable downloads. --