On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 09:36:23PM +0300, s7r wrote:
> The mail list is public, so it's not like the data on it is somehow
> sensitive. Sourcefoge is fine, it has a nice web UI where you can browse
> the message and sort/order them as you want, etc.
>
> Why would you want to move to a paid solutio
highlight that people who do not commit a lot of
> code contribute in other, arguably equal ways.
>
>
> From: Troy Benjegerdes
> Sent: 10 June 2015 19:58
> To: Patrick Mccorry (PGR)
> Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceFor
Hello,
Thanks for testing this clarifying things about PGP/MIME and I apologize
for wasting your time with it. It looks like a SPAM filtering service I
use is re-writing some parts of some plain text messages with some
special/alternate encoding characters (not sure what it really is).
Anyway
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Andy Schroder
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A couple of motivations for a mailing list switch:
>
>1. Sometimes the mailing list delays delivery for 10 minutes to
>several days.
>2. There are usually lots of ads at the footer of the messages. Really
>confus
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 03:36:42PM -0400, Andy Schroder wrote:
> It's possible that the enigmail extension is not working right, but
> I was under the impression that it is just feeding data to gpg and
> then receiving the response back. It's possible that your e-mail you
> just checked was not sen
Andy Schroder
On 06/10/2015 03:20 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 03:12:02PM -0400, Andy Schroder wrote:
Andy Schroder
On 06/10/2015 03:03 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
4. Seems like digital signatures are always broken on messages because
the list server slightly modifies them (?)
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 03:12:02PM -0400, Andy Schroder wrote:
>
> Andy Schroder
>
> On 06/10/2015 03:03 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> >
> >>4. Seems like digital signatures are always broken on messages because
> >>the list server slightly modifies them (?), so my e-mail client
> >>doesn't ver
"My opinion is the most sustainable solution would be to identify a
team of admins and use something like Digital Ocean's new team accounts
feature and have someone like SolidX contribute funds for the servers
and a few hours a week from one of their sysadmins to the team."
This is a perfectly fin
Andy Schroder
On 06/10/2015 03:03 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
4. Seems like digital signatures are always broken on messages because
the list server slightly modifies them (?), so my e-mail client
doesn't verify them all.
What type of digital signatures specifically? What email client?
I
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 02:59:48PM -0400, Andy Schroder wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A couple of motivations for a mailing list switch:
>
> 1. Sometimes the mailing list delays delivery for 10 minutes to several
>days.
> 2. There are usually lots of ads at the footer of the messages. Really
>confu
Hello,
A couple of motivations for a mailing list switch:
1. Sometimes the mailing list delays delivery for 10 minutes to several
days.
2. There are usually lots of ads at the footer of the messages. Really
confuses new readers (for me at least), and seems like it really
pollutes such a
I think if the consensus is "pay with commits or pay with bitcoin"
we might have a consensus from the people that actually matter very
quickly, because they've already paid ;)
My opinion is the most sustainable solution would be to identify a
team of admins and use something like Digital Ocean's
I'll sponsor it, if we agree to implement a HashCash spam filter
in the next 6 months. I've run mail servers for $DAYJOB for 5 or
so years, and I've run my own personal server for the last 14.
Since Bitcoin is a perfectly good HashCash system, I'm thinking a
http://www.courier-mta.org/courierfilte
Hello Troy,
I like the idea of the live mirrors. I'm personally just an amateur at
setting up e-mail servers, but the first concern I have is that everyone
hosting a mirror may not necessarily use the same SMTP MTA. I personally
use postfix, but I'm not sure what most people use.
Some other
The mail list is public, so it's not like the data on it is somehow
sensitive. Sourcefoge is fine, it has a nice web UI where you can browse
the message and sort/order them as you want, etc.
Why would you want to move to a paid solution? And why would you want
users to have to pay per message? Thi
I like elegant solutions and while eventually I can see a "pay to
contribute" service, I don't imagine you'll get consensus in short order.
List provider costs are pretty reasonable, so if that's the hurdle to
overcome I'm happy to offer sponsorship.
Ivan Brightly
SolidX Partners
On Wed, Jun 10,
Regarding changing the e-mail list provider. Is anyone interested in
sponsoring it? There are non-free options, but it may be difficult to
always ensure the fee is being paid to the provider. I think finding an
agreeable free solution may have been the issue before? I've also
thought of trying
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:25:12AM +0200, xor wrote:
> http://www.howtogeek.com/218764/warning-don%E2%80%99t-download-software-from-sourceforge-if-you-can-help-it/
All our downloads (even old ones) have recently been deleted from sourceforge,
for this reason. They haven't been mentioned in Bitcon
http://www.howtogeek.com/218764/warning-don%E2%80%99t-download-software-from-sourceforge-if-you-can-help-it/
TL;DR:
> In 2013, GIMP’s developers pulled the GIMP Windows downloads from
> SourceForge. SourceForge was full of misleading advertisements
> masquerading as “Download” buttons — something
19 matches
Mail list logo