Damn, that happens if I do the overview as an afterthought. Fixed :-)
Real time (last 24 hours, last week, last month) are in the pipeline,
just need to find the time to implement access to the collector from
the webpage.
--
Christian Decker
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
>
Hey Christian,
Could you sort the snapshots by date? At the moment they're kind of in a
random order.
Sometimes I wish we had real-time stats too but this is a great start.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Christian Decker <
decker.christ...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Mike for the Tip :-)
>
>
Thanks Mike for the Tip :-)
I will definitely extend the calculations to include a size-normalized
version. As for transaction propagations, being much smaller the
measurements tend to be much noisier, but given enough samples we
might be able to reconstruct some of the system parameters.
Good id
Hi Christian,
Cool - thanks for posting - agree, that it would be nice to normalize
the results with block size - so divide by size and:
1. see if there is a correlation (we all presume there still is)
2. plot the delay graph as e.g. normalized to the averaged blocksize or
lets define a "standard
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 05:20:22PM +0100, Christian Decker wrote:
> Since this came up again during the discussion of the Cornell paper I
> thought I'd dig up my measurement code from the Information
> Propagation paper and automate it as much as possible.
>
> The result is the Network Propagation
This is great, thanks for doing it. Tip sent your way.
Graphs of how propagation data change over time would also be helpful (as
well as raw data so we can calculate overhead per kilobyte and so on). I
know there are only two days worth of data, but for future, it'd be good.
I think the next part
Sure thing, I'm looking for a good way to publish these measurements,
but I haven't found a good option yet. They are rather large in size,
so I'd rather not serve them along with the website as it hasn't got
the capacity. Any suggestions? If the demand is not huge I could
provide them on a per use
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Christian Decker
wrote:
> Since this came up again during the discussion of the Cornell paper I
> thought I'd dig up my measurement code from the Information
> Propagation paper and automate it as much as possible.
Could you publish the block ids and timestamp set
Since this came up again during the discussion of the Cornell paper I
thought I'd dig up my measurement code from the Information
Propagation paper and automate it as much as possible.
The result is the Network Propagation page on bitcoinstats.com
(http://bitcoinstats.com/network/propagation/). It
9 matches
Mail list logo
