14/06/18/how-to-disincentivize-large-bitcoin-mining-pools/
[2] https://cs.umd.edu/~amiller/nonoutsourceable.pdf
--
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:54:15 +
> From: Hector Chu
> Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Requiring a miner's signature
If you're interested in working on mining decentralisation, chipping away
at getblocktemplate support would be a better path forward. It's possible
to have decentralised pooled mining - I know it sounds like a contradiction
but it's not.
I wrote about some of the things that can be done in this bl
Den 11 feb 2015 09:55 skrev "Hector Chu" :
>
> A proposal for stemming the tide of mining centralisation -- Requiring a
> miner's signature in the block header (the whole of which is hashed), and
> paying out coinbase to the miner's public key.
>
> Please comment on whether this idea is feasible, h
A proposal for stemming the tide of mining centralisation -- Requiring a
miner's signature in the block header (the whole of which is hashed), and
paying out coinbase to the miner's public key.
Please comment on whether this idea is feasible, has been thought of before,
etc., etc. Thank you.
Moti
4 matches
Mail list logo
