...
--
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:25:27 +0100
From: Natanael natanae...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Requiring a miner's
signature in the block header
To: Hector Chu hector...@gmail.com
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID
A proposal for stemming the tide of mining centralisation -- Requiring a
miner's signature in the block header (the whole of which is hashed), and
paying out coinbase to the miner's public key.
Please comment on whether this idea is feasible, has been thought of before,
etc., etc. Thank you.
Den 11 feb 2015 09:55 skrev Hector Chu hector...@gmail.com:
A proposal for stemming the tide of mining centralisation -- Requiring a
miner's signature in the block header (the whole of which is hashed), and
paying out coinbase to the miner's public key.
Please comment on whether this idea is
If you're interested in working on mining decentralisation, chipping away
at getblocktemplate support would be a better path forward. It's possible
to have decentralised pooled mining - I know it sounds like a contradiction
but it's not.
I wrote about some of the things that can be done in this
4 matches
Mail list logo
