On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Justus Ranvier wrote:
> On 03/29/2014 08:05 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>> Use dust-b-gone and make it someone elses problem to get it relayed. :)
> That's a sub-optimal solution, as it introduces a third party. What if
> his server goes down?
> An universal solutio
On 03/29/2014 08:05 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Use dust-b-gone and make it someone elses problem to get it relayed. :)
>
That's a sub-optimal solution, as it introduces a third party. What if
his server goes down?
An universal solution is preferable.
--
Support online privacy by using email
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Justus Ranvier
wrote:
> What would make it easier is if there was a standard output type for
> sending the entire transaction to miner fees,
Hm. maybe it could be called a "return operator" or something like that? :)
> that would make even large
> transactions p
On 03/29/2014 07:55 PM, Goss, Brian C., M.D. wrote:
> Could you collect the dust into a transaction with no outputs (thus making it
> all tx fees) or putting in to an anyone can spend tx?
>
> The large number of signatures (for large n) would make the tx size
> large...but, if enough dust were o
4 matches
Mail list logo
