::brainstorm:: So if I download the source and compile using gcc3.4 (say) would that work?On 8/16/06, D. E. Evans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: when I run bbkeys I get: *** glibc detected*** free(): invalid pointer:
0x0808b3d8 *** Any ideas?If I remember right, this is a problem with compiling bbkeys
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 15:44:10 -0600, D. E. Evans wrote:
when I run bbkeys I get: *** glibc detected*** free(): invalid pointer:
0x0808b3d8 ***
Any ideas?
If I remember right, this is a problem with compiling bbkeys with
gcc 4.
For the record, bbkeys works fine with gcc
::brainstorm:: So if I download the source and compile using gcc3.4 (say)
would that work?
Yes. There's also an rpm distributed via sf.net/projects/bbkeys.
Does anyone else know if the bbkeys source at sf.net has been
patched for use with gcc 4?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Google suggests that it's a problem with the ubuntu/debian package:
I have begun to distrust the packaged software of OS distributions.
It is becoming more and more common for me to get my software from
the developers directly, and blackbox/bbtools is one them.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
D. E. Evans wrote:
Google suggests that it's a problem with the ubuntu/debian package:
I have begun to distrust the packaged software of OS distributions.
It is becoming more and more common for me to get my software from the
developers directly, and blackbox/bbtools is one them.
I
Ciprian Popovici wrote:
I would've personally though that the EWMH support in 0.70.x more than
makes up for the loss of bbtools, by allowing users to combine
Blackbox with a very wide variety of pieces from various desktop
environments, not to mention standalone software that also supports
Larson, Timothy E. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I invite anyone who does know what's going on to look over these posts,
and see what can be done. Maybe Jan even lurks on this list???
He does indeed. :-)
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-pkg/2005/11/05/0011.html
Jan Schaumann wrote:
Larson, Timothy E. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-pkg/2005/11/05/0011.html
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-pkg/2005/11/05/0012.html
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-pkg/2005/11/05/0014.html
And these do remain my concerns. From my point
I'm having trouble with bbkeys.
This (from http://bbkeys.sourceforge.net/) is interesting, though:
Now, bbkeys is just one example of what having an
external-to-the-window-manager program handling keybindings can be
like. Another extremely well-written keygrabber for blackbox is the
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 21:25:30 +0100, Andy Jones wrote:
::sigh:: I sort of knew this would happen. I've had trouble with
compiling bbkeys before. I'm not a C programmer, so maybe it's me.
On the other hand, I can certainly agree with those posting here that
wonder why these tools
On Thursday 17 August 2006 10:29, D. E. Evans wrote:
::brainstorm:: So if I download the source and compile using gcc3.4
:: (say)
would that work?
Yes. There's also an rpm distributed via sf.net/projects/bbkeys.
Does anyone else know if the bbkeys source at sf.net has been
On Thursday 17 August 2006 16:34, Andy Jones wrote:
I'm having trouble with bbkeys.
Maybe you can clarify what trouble you're having?
[clip of my quoted website. =;)]
Now, I've looked for a seperate epistrophy package. I've even
(::shudder::) dowloaded Openbox. But I can't see a way to get
12 matches
Mail list logo
