screenshot looks sweet man!! =:)
On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 17:30, Bradley T Hughes wrote:
> I just finished submitting the work that I've been doing on blackbox for
> the past month and a half (while I was waiting for shaleh to return).
>
> Lots and lots of things have been happening, and lots of t
On Sunday 16 November 2003 13:04, Bradley T Hughes wrote:
> On Sunday 16 November 2003 09:49, Robert Marshall wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > SF's anon-cvs seems to have an error that the above referenced
> > > tarball does not. With the anon-cvs all comp
On Sunday 16 November 2003 09:49, Robert Marshall wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
[snip]
> > SF's anon-cvs seems to have an error that the above referenced
> > tarball does not. With the anon-cvs all compile attempts were
> > failing with:
[snip]
>
> I see that too and
[snip]
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 11:30:36PM +0100, Bradley T Hughes wrote:
>>
>> Feel free to try out the code from CVS... if anonymous CVS isn't
>> working that well (sourceforge is still upgrading their hardware as
>> far as I know), you can snag a snapshot
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 11:30:36PM +0100, Bradley T Hughes wrote:
>
> Feel free to try out the code from CVS... if anonymous CVS isn't
> working that well (sourceforge is still upgrading their hardware as
> far as I know), you can snag a snapshot from
> http://blackboxwm.sourceforge.net/blackbox.t
I just finished submitting the work that I've been doing on blackbox for
the past month and a half (while I was waiting for shaleh to return).
Lots and lots of things have been happening, and lots of things have changed.
I managed to touch every source file in CVS (except for lib/i18n.hh) over t
