Re: blackbox 0.65 vs. 0.70 (was: blackbox 0.70.1; bbkeys 0.9.0 - bbkeys crashes with invalid pointer)

2006-08-18 Thread Ciprian Popovici
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:12:35 -0400 Jan Schaumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And these do remain my concerns. From my point of view as somebody who supports a large number of users (many of which use blackbox), I can't just replace blackbox 0.65 with 0.70 without forcing those users to change

Re: blackbox 0.65 vs. 0.70 (was: blackbox 0.70.1; bbkeys 0.9.0 - bbkeys crashes with invalid pointer)

2006-08-18 Thread Andy Jones
Can I put my 2c in as a user? What happens then? Everybody who launches Blackbox 0.70 and bbkeys 0.9 will get basic keyboard functionality, including Alt+TAB and workspace switching via Alt+digit [...] Yep. That's what you get. And frankly that's all I need to make Blackbox work for me.

RE: blackbox 0.65 vs. 0.70 (was: blackbox 0.70.1; bbkeys 0.9.0 - bbkeys crashes with invalid pointer)

2006-08-17 Thread Larson, Timothy E.
Jan Schaumann wrote: Larson, Timothy E. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-pkg/2005/11/05/0011.html http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-pkg/2005/11/05/0012.html http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-pkg/2005/11/05/0014.html And these do remain my concerns. From my point