On 20-Mar-2002 Brandon Thigpen wrote:
> Huh?
>
That was cryptic developer speak for "we are working on features that will give
you what you want as a side effect".
>
> I figured it was the only piece that was likely to stay constant
> if the application forked off several children.
>
> Do you have a better idea?
>
no, but I am still willing to take new ones (-:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 01:43:00PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> >
> > Can blackbox perhaps setpgrp after forking, and use an api like BSD
> > fstat or lsof to map a connecting socket back to a process group
> > it knows about and if it does, put it in the desktop that was open
> > when it
>
> Can blackbox perhaps setpgrp after forking, and use an api like BSD
> fstat or lsof to map a connecting socket back to a process group
> it knows about and if it does, put it in the desktop that was open
> when it was launched (or perhaps a "launch in") option? If you make
> this pgrp -> wor
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 09:11:22PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> >
> > Think about what bblaunch does. (/me says this knowing shaleh hates
> > bblaunch...)
> >
>
> yeah, and bblaunch barely works.
>
> To implement this would mean adding a run queue. When blackbox starts an app
> it woul
I copied it from the archive web site. I didn't get the list email
with the attachment because I forgot to change my procmail settings
to stop trashing all list mail.
Where can I find this 'original' version that worked for you?
--
BT
>Tuesday, March 19, 2002, 02:54:03, Brandon Thigpen
><[EM
Tuesday, March 19, 2002, 02:54:03, Brandon Thigpen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Hunk #1 succeeded at 714 with fuzz 1.
> - patching file blackbox-0.62.1/configure.in
> - patching file blackbox-0.62.1/src/Window.cc
> - patch: malformed patch at line 158:
Did you apply the patch which was sen
