Çë¿´ÍêÒÔϵÄÎÄ×Ö£¬ÔÙ¾ö¶¨ÄúÊÇ·ñµã»÷Ï·½µÄÁ¬½Ó¡£
²ÆÉñϵͳÒÑÈ«Ãæ¼ÓÇ¿£¬Õ¾µãÓµÓÐÄ¿Ç°ËùÓйúÄÚMLMÕ¾µãµÄÏà¹ØÐÅÏ¢£¬¾ø¶ÔÊÇͬÆäËûÀàÕ¾µãËùÎÞ·¨±ÈÄâµÄ¡£
ºÜ¶àÈ˶¼ÏÛĽÄÇЩÓÐÇ®ÈË£¬ÏÛĽËûÃÇÓÐƯÁÁµÄ·¿×Ó¡¢³µ×Ó¡¢ÆÞ×Ó£¬Ò»ÇеÄÒ»ÇС£
¿´µ½µÄÊÇËûÃÇÊÂÒµµÄÈçºÎ³É¹¦£¬È´Ã»Óп´µ½ËûÃÇ´´ÒµµÄ¼èÄÑ¡£
´ó¶àÊýÈ˲»ÊÇÒ»ÉúÏÂÀ´¾Í¸»ÓУ¬
With a little help from Hal King I was able to solve the problem I had
when compiling BlackBox on Solaris 2.8. So incase anyone else has or is
having the same problem, here's what I had to do:
When running configure, explicitely include libstdc++ like so:
LIBS=-lstdc++ ./configure --prefix=/o
On 15-Apr-2002 William K Baran wrote:
> With a little help from Hal King I was able to solve the problem I had
> when compiling BlackBox on Solaris 2.8. So incase anyone else has or is
> having the same problem, here's what I had to do:
>
> When running configure, explicitely include libstdc++ l
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On 15-Apr-2002 William K Baran wrote:
> > With a little help from Hal King I was able to solve the problem I had
> > when compiling BlackBox on Solaris 2.8. So incase anyone else has or is
> > having the same problem, here's what I had to do:
> >
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 01:03:41PM -0400, Eric Binet wrote:
> I think LD_LIBRARY_PATH is only used at runtime, this means that the
> compiler only checks standard directories automatically. Maybe you had
> libstdc++ in a nonstandard directory. This might be why you had to tell
> configure.
right,
If you have the time, please have a look at this:
http://xlife.zuavra.net/blackbox/
It's supposed to be an overview of BlackBox. I'm not sure if I got
everything right, especially stuff about the "history" of BlackBox.
I'd appreciate comments, pointers and maybe some extra info about the
beginnin
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 23:48:03 +0300
"Ciprian Popovici" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you have the time, please have a look at this:
> http://xlife.zuavra.net/blackbox/
Interesting.
> I'd appreciate comments, pointers and maybe some extra info about the
> beginnings of BlackBox.
A few observat
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 11:48:03PM +0300, Ciprian Popovici wrote:
> If you have the time, please have a look at this:
> http://xlife.zuavra.net/blackbox/
Not bad. Too much text tho'... begs for sub-pages.
> It's supposed to be an overview of BlackBox. I'm not sure if I got
> everything right, e
On 15-Apr-2002 Ciprian Popovici wrote:
> If you have the time, please have a look at this:
> http://xlife.zuavra.net/blackbox/
>
> It's supposed to be an overview of BlackBox. I'm not sure if I got
> everything right, especially stuff about the "history" of BlackBox.
> I'd appreciate comments, po
IMHO:
It's the Philosophy of blackbox, not the spirit:
Small, Fast, Robust.
Notice the intellectual recursion, Anything else is just buzzwords.
-
Blackbox needs a backup presence on the net, bad. Brad et.al. had a pretty good
tutorial
going at the blackbox.alug.org site but it hasn't been
>
> -
> Blackbox needs a backup presence on the net, bad. Brad et.al. had a pretty
> good tutorial
> going at the blackbox.alug.org site but it hasn't been updated in many months
> (that I
> could tell), maybe you could help yourself to one degree or another and
> ensure that it
> lives. Coll
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 05:17:12PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> Mac OS X
Does the current CVS work under OS X? I haven't tried. I'm still running
61.1 there. :)
--
Marc Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.cox.net/msw
On 16-Apr-2002 Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 05:17:12PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> Mac OS X
>
> Does the current CVS work under OS X? I haven't tried. I'm still running
> 61.1 there. :)
>
I have been told it does.
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>>-
>>Blackbox needs a backup presence on the net, bad. Brad et.al. had a pretty
>>good tutorial
>>going at the blackbox.alug.org site but it hasn't been updated in many months
>>(that I
>>could tell), maybe you could help yourself to one degree or another and
>>ens
As far as the slit is concerned, if apps will eventually be movable
within it, how about having that the moving be accomplished with a
menu? On the slit border around an app, the menu items "Move Up" and
"Move Down" (and "Move Left" and "Move Right" for the other orientation)
can be used to move t
On 16-Apr-2002 Es Bee Ex wrote:
> As far as the slit is concerned, if apps will eventually be movable
> within it, how about having that the moving be accomplished with a
> menu? On the slit border around an app, the menu items "Move Up" and
> "Move Down" (and "Move Left" and "Move Right" for the
IMHO disclaimer
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry declaimed:
> On 16-Apr-2002 Es Bee Ex wrote:
> > As far as the slit is concerned, if apps will eventually be movable
> > within it, how about having that the moving be accomplished with a
> > menu? On the slit border around an app, the menu items "Move Up" and
>>
>> I have yet to come up with a better name. Frankly calling it the Dock seems
>> reasonable. Blackbox owes a lot to Window Maker anyways.
> Dock is cool. Wharf sounds like a Klingon. When Sean posed the idea, I
> immediately thought of 'box', but that's probably too generic.
>
I too thoug
--- Paul Mackinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since Alt-dragging is the standard for repositioning
> windows (especially
> windows without borders), this seems like the
> intuitive means to move
> windowlets (or whatever the heck they're called) in
> the slit.
yes yes yes. i use alt+left but
FWIW, I thought that maybe an alternative to "slit" could be "pocket". Even
non-english speakers could recogbnise that you can put apps into your pocket.
The moving of apps within the slit|pocket|whatever would be handy with the
alt+mouse. I can see why someone would want the menu "move up|down",
On 16-Apr-2002 Neverness wrote:
> FWIW, I thought that maybe an alternative to "slit" could be "pocket". Even
> non-english speakers could recogbnise that you can put apps into your pocket.
>
> The moving of apps within the slit|pocket|whatever would be handy with the
> alt+mouse. I can see why s
Want
To Get A Lot Of Target Email
Addresses In A Very Short Time?
Target Email Extractor is a
powerful Email Software that harvests Target Email
Addresses from search engines, any specified starting URLs , including
22 matches
Mail list logo
