On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 07:37:01PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> >
> > I am just wondering about that mouse wheel patch... Is there any reason why
> > it wouldn't be incorporated into the next Blackbox release? I mean, it should
> > be stable enough, and I don't think that it really slows
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 11:27:50AM -0400, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
> Okay, so this has really nothing to do with the development or use of a
> window manager, but it's something I've been curious about in my 2.5+
> years of Linux experience:
>
> Why do most of the good X window managers hav
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:47:48PM +0200, Ciprian Popovici wrote:
> Anyone knows how I can get in touch with the creator of the Artwiz
> fonts? All the pages about him seem to have dissapeared. I want to
> distribute artwiz fonts with the styles I make for BlackBox, in case
> they use one, and I'd
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 06:05:02PM -0700, Marius Nita wrote:
> > Is this in opaque mode?
>
> yup.
err... i meant no. it's in box moving mode.
it seems that when you click the bar and start moving the window, the instant
the box is created, half of it (the right and bottom l
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 02:44:45PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On 09-Apr-2002 David Bonner wrote:
> > Hey, I just (Tue Apr 9 17:09:11 EDT 2002) built the latest from
> > cvs, and i'm seeing lines apparently "dropped" from the edges of
> > windows when i drag them around. Is anyone else s
erry wrote:
> On 02-Apr-2002 Marius Nita wrote:
> > This should at least be used for disabled menu items. Right now, disabled
> > items look anything but disabled. Also, you may consider having one disabled
> > item that says "(empty)" or something similar in empty menu
This should at least be used for disabled menu items. Right now, disabled
items look anything but disabled. Also, you may consider having one disabled
item that says "(empty)" or something similar in empty menus.
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 08:40:29AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On 02-Apr-200
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:28:46PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> >>
> > Don't know about bsd, but for linux 'killall blackbox' seems easier.
> >
>
> killall is quite dangerous. I often log in again and launch blackbox to test
> things. killall would indeed kill all. killall as root work
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 01:16:14PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> IMHO this is why window managers have virtual desktops. I use six on each
> head. Usually four of each six have a plan as to what's running on them,
> and the other two on each head are for parking things when I don't need
> them.
>
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 10:15:27PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> I too use Xinerama in Blackbox, and have some difficulty understanding
> the frequently voiced viewpoint that Blackbox's Xinerama support is
> broken in some way. There is nothing broken concerning Blackbox's
> current Xinerama s
Let's put the toolbar in the slit and the slit in the toolbar, so we can
be cool and have the first doubly-recursive FEATURE, as opposed to the lame,
traditional acronyms. Yah?
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 12:53:47AM +0100, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 04:30:54PM -0600, Jamin W.
BTW, I made sort of a blackbox logo a while back, as a Photoshop exercise. The
jpeg version is here:
http://web.pdx.edu/~marius/dl/blackbox.jpg
and the fully layered Photoshop file (if you want to just use the box or the
text, or simply modify it) is here:
http://web.pdx.edu/~ma
If anyone wants to lay out some designs for a new website, I will code it.
I'm ShrimpX on IRC, btw.
marius.
13 matches
Mail list logo
