> It still seems odd to me that people want to have other windows on top of a
> window they are using.
It's not that odd :
Often I'm working on coding projects and I have an xterm thats barely
visible. I use this term to compile, I just have to do [up][enter] then,
during compilation, I raise the
On 21-Apr-2002 Eric Binet wrote:
>> It still seems odd to me that people want to have other windows on top of a
>> window they are using.
>
> It's not that odd :
> Often I'm working on coding projects and I have an xterm thats barely
> visible. I use this term to compile, I just have to do [up][e
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002 16:26:06 +1200
"Matt Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 21:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
> "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It still seems odd to me that people want to have other windows on
> > top of a window they are using.
>
> heh... guess
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 21:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Why not have two options... one to set the focus type (click to
focus,> > sloppy focus, focus follows mouse), then have an option
whether or not to> > raise on click (click to raise)?
> >
I would
>
> Why not have two options... one to set the focus type (click to focus,
> sloppy focus, focus follows mouse), then have an option whether or not to
> raise on click (click to raise)?
>
I suppose we could do that.
It still seems odd to me that people want to have other windows on top of a
wi
On Sat, Apr20,02 18:51, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On 21-Apr-2002 Matt Wilson wrote:
> > I see that now a click anywhere in a window raises it, as opposed to the old
> > model
> > of having to explicitly raise it. Was this intentional? I for one personally
> > preferred having to explicitly rais
On 21-Apr-2002 Matt Wilson wrote:
> I see that now a click anywhere in a window raises it, as opposed to the old
> model
> of having to explicitly raise it. Was this intentional? I for one personally
> preferred having to explicitly raise the window - it made working with
> overlapping
> windows a
I see that now a click anywhere in a window raises it, as opposed to the old model
of having to explicitly raise it. Was this intentional? I for one personally
preferred having to explicitly raise the window - it made working with overlapping
windows a little more sensible.
Will it stay how it is