MenuTokenizer, take 3

2002-04-25 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
So, I slept on the bbconf ideas and the requests for trimmed whitespace. The result is a cleaner, easier to read next() method which has *0* gotos (-: Comments welcome as always. Note, the tokenizer now lets [ This \[token\] ] through the chunk finder but it then fails to be found in the

Re: MenuTokenizer, take 3

2002-04-25 Thread Derek Cunningham
On Thu, Apr25,02 12:54, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: So, I slept on the bbconf ideas and the requests for trimmed whitespace. The result is a cleaner, easier to read next() method which has *0* gotos (-: Comments welcome as always. Note, the tokenizer now lets [ This \[token\] ] through

Re: MenuTokenizer, take 3

2002-04-25 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 25-Apr-2002 Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: So, I slept on the bbconf ideas and the requests for trimmed whitespace. The result is a cleaner, easier to read next() method which has *0* gotos (-: Comments welcome as always. Note, the tokenizer now lets [ This \[token\] ] through the chunk

Re: MenuTokenizer, take 3

2002-04-25 Thread mackstann
root sweetbunnysex OOOPS WRONG WINDOW HAHA! ;) --- Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 25-Apr-2002 Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: So, I slept on the bbconf ideas and the requests for trimmed whitespace. The result is a cleaner, easier to read next() method which has *0*