Re: additional verbosity

2002-07-11 Thread Jamin W . Collins
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002 00:32:15 +0200 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tried to apply patch, it asked for what file to patch. Sorry, but I have > very little experience in using the patch command. Perhaps it's > Blackbox.cc ? Some patch output seemed to indicate this. the second patch sould be applie

Re: additional verbosity

2002-07-11 Thread Øyvind Stegard
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: >Ok, to further track this down, I added a new print much earlier in the >process. This is the absolute earliest that blackbox is aware of the window >and 100% could have done nothing to affect it. No X calls have been made on >the client's behalf at this point. > >Ap

RE: additional verbosity

2002-07-11 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 11-Jul-2002 Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > Ok, to further track this down, I added a new print much earlier in the > process. This is the absolute earliest that blackbox is aware of the window > and 100% could have done nothing to affect it. No X calls have been made on > the client's behalf at

additional verbosity

2002-07-11 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Ok, to further track this down, I added a new print much earlier in the process. This is the absolute earliest that blackbox is aware of the window and 100% could have done nothing to affect it. No X calls have been made on the client's behalf at this point. Apply it on top of the previous patc