On Thursday 07 February 2002 21:59, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 20:35:27 +0100
> > From: Mads Martin J?rgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Lets keep this like the kernel. One guy gets all the patches, and
> > decides what goes in or not.
Decisions are not a reason for or against
> Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 20:35:27 +0100
> From: Mads Martin J?rgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: David Terrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: cvs on sf.net
>
> *
* Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Feb 07. 2002 20:24]:
> > Are you planning on letting other people commit to the cvs tree
> > on sf directly?
>
> not really. xOr may eventually get access. Of course plans change. Nothing
> is set in stone.
>
> Blackbox has never been in CVS before.
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 11:22:24AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> On 07-Feb-2002 David Terrell wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 11:02:41AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Vendor branches don't give you good commit history.
> >> >
> >>
> >> but they do reflect my code a
On 07-Feb-2002 David Terrell wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 11:02:41AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> >
>> > Vendor branches don't give you good commit history.
>> >
>>
>> but they do reflect my code and cvs usage.
>
> Are you planning on letting other people commit to the cvs tree
> o
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 11:02:41AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> >
> > Vendor branches don't give you good commit history.
> >
>
> but they do reflect my code and cvs usage.
Are you planning on letting other people commit to the cvs tree
on sf directly?
--
David Terrell| "S
>
> Vendor branches don't give you good commit history.
>
but they do reflect my code and cvs usage.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 06:08:44PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> ok, cvs is up to date on sf.net. It even has 0.62.1pre0 which is not released.
>
> The website shows (0 commits, 0 adds). Not sure how it tracks this. My usual
> usage of cvs is:
>
> cvs import "blackbox version" blackbox
The CVS stats on SF.net are updated every day (or two). You won't see
the commits until the next day.
I think the stats are recorded every day, but don't always make it to
the Web pages. It almost looks like somebody does the recording and
updating manually. *shrug*
Anyway, the stats are not
>>
>> For some reason it does not consider my usage a commit or an add. cvs is
>> being
>> used, just not in the way some people are accustomed to seeing.
>
> Will you be making mention of this somewhere on the page, perhaps on the
> newly created blackbox page, when it's done?
>
definately,
On Fri, Jan25,02 18:08, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> ok, cvs is up to date on sf.net. It even has 0.62.1pre0 which is not released.
>
> The website shows (0 commits, 0 adds). Not sure how it tracks this. My usual
> usage of cvs is:
>
> cvs import "blackbox version" blackbox blackbox blackbox-
ok, cvs is up to date on sf.net. It even has 0.62.1pre0 which is not released.
The website shows (0 commits, 0 adds). Not sure how it tracks this. My usual
usage of cvs is:
cvs import "blackbox version" blackbox blackbox blackbox-0_XX_X
so at any time you can do
cvs co -rblackbox-0_XX_X to
12 matches
Mail list logo