Re: sgml-common installation

Bruce Dubbs wrote: Tushar Teredesai wrote: This brings up another question that I had brought up on LFS recently . I'm really not anxious to add those packages to BLFS, if for no other reason than division of la

Re: sgm-common: command changes

Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 07/25/05 01:39 CST: > Since I am already correcting the explainations for the package in the > same file, why not? Um, because the Editor of the book said to leave the current instructions the way they are? Seems like a good enough reason to me to leave it t