Re: Suggestions for the nano package

2005-07-26 Thread David Jensen
Randy McMurchy wrote: I would like to propose the following suggestions to the nano text editing package instructions: I believe all of your suggestions are a step forward. -- David Jensen -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ:

Package for rotating log files

2005-07-26 Thread Randy McMurchy
Hi all, The BLFS book is sorely in need of a package used to rotate, compress, store, archive, whatever - various log files. Traditionally, this has been the logrotate package. I'm going to try to get a package into the book before 6.1 is released. I probably should be concerned about more

Re: ext3 filesystems and e2fsck

2005-07-26 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Randy McMurchy wrote: And, noticing that Igor set up the ext3 filesystems on Anduin, where the checks are enabled in /etc/fstab, I would think that he does as well (I could be wrong in that Bruce may have set up the filesystem structure, and if so, s/Igor/Bruce/ in the above). I'm not sure.

Re: Apache 2.0.54 OpenSSL 0.9.8

2005-07-26 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Laurens Blankers wrote: Hi all, Apache 2.0.54 (and most likely earlier versions as well) won't compile against OpenSSL 0.9.8. See this post for a fix: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200507.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please see:

Re: Package for rotating log files

2005-07-26 Thread David Jensen
Randy McMurchy wrote: The floor is now open for discussion about which packages folks use, or if you use a home-brewed script, please contribute. If we're going to add a package to BLFS, it may as well be the best/most favorite/you pick the adjective/ package. I have no use for anything even

Re: ext3 filesystems and e2fsck

2005-07-26 Thread Archaic
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 05:24:02PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote: So, that said, let's don't make any changes for a few days and let as many folks that care to comment, state their ideas. I use it and it has helped find problems. -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your

Re: Package for rotating log files

2005-07-26 Thread David Jensen
David Jensen wrote: Attached an old version of cleanup. If I had time to setup fcron, I'd update it. All logs aren't in this script. I cleaned it up. Note: I exclude kern messages from sys.log, so it is quite small. I don't know why the LFS syslog.conf default has the kern messages

Re: Suggestions for the nano package

2005-07-26 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Randy McMurchy wrote: Hi all, I would like to propose the following suggestions to the nano text editing package instructions: Points 1, 2 and 3 are valid. 4. Drop slang from the list of optional dependencies, or explain that it doesn't work (produces blinking instead of bright colors on

Re: Suggestions for the nano package

2005-07-26 Thread Tushar Teredesai
On 7/26/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3. Move the documentation installation dir from /usr/share/doc/nano to /usr/share/doc/nano-1.2.5. This fits the growing trend with packages to install docs in a versioned subdir. The rest of them I agree with. I also agree with this one since

Re: Suggestions for the nano package

2005-07-26 Thread Randy McMurchy
Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 07/26/05 23:08 CST: On 7/26/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3. Move the documentation installation dir from /usr/share/doc/nano to /usr/share/doc/nano-1.2.5. This fits the growing trend with packages to install docs in a versioned subdir. The