Simple question :-) I'm editing the book to add an required patch for
an optional configuration switch (--with-libcurl) to GnuPG.
I've introduced the patch to the patches project svn - I'm assuming this
gets to be visible on the website downloads section by some render
process to the website. (co
Richard A Downing wrote these words on 09/05/05 05:20 CST:
> 1) How do I get it to be at a regular BLFS patch location, e.g.:
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/downloads/svn/gnupg-1.4.2-curl_LDAP-1.patch
> which I assume is what is needed for the book. Should I add it to the
> patches dir (a
Hi!
I'm planning to update all [B,H]LFS books (trunk and active branches) to use
the new DocBook-XSL-1.69.1 version the next Saturday 2005-09-10 at 12h UTC.
Please, update your machines to can render the books using that new XSL
version.
Thanks.
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº28
Hi folks,
Looking at the current instructions for libxml2 (simply because 2.6.21
was released today), it omits the more extensive test suites that are
available from the W3C [0]. There's a test framework available in the
xstc/ subdirectory of the tarball, into which one can place
xsts-2002-0
Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 09/05/05 14:05 CST:
> Hi folks,
>
> Looking at the current instructions for libxml2 (simply because 2.6.21
> was released today), it omits the more extensive test suites that are
> available from the W3C [0]. There's a test framework available in the
> xstc
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote these words on 09/05/05 05:20 CST:
>
>
>>1) How do I get it to be at a regular BLFS patch location, e.g.:
>>http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/downloads/svn/gnupg-1.4.2-curl_LDAP-1.patch
>>which I assume is what is needed for the book. Should I a
Randy McMurchy wrote:
In version 2.6.20, these files are downloaded automatically through
the regular "make check" process.
Oh, yeah, I see that now...I tried compiling libxml2 on a bare-bones LFS
system, hence didn't have `wget' installed yet! Is that worth
mentioning as a dependency (test
Richard A Downing wrote:
Yes. I had already done this in my sandbox before you took on the bug.
So, I committed it and removed it. I figured that was the easiest
thing for me to do as once I did an svn add in my sandbox, I couldn't
remove it.
svm rm --force file
Might that have worked?
--
JH
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Richard A Downing wrote:
Yes. I had already done this in my sandbox before you took on the bug.
So, I committed it and removed it. I figured that was the easiest
thing for me to do as once I did an svn add in my sandbox, I couldn't
remove it.
svm rm --force file
Might
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 09/05/05 15:29 CST:
> svm rm --force file
>
> Might that have worked?
Probably. Sounds like you know what you are talking about. :-)
I never tried that, in fact I didn't try anything except I remember
from long ago trying to remove a file that I had already
Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 09/05/05 15:28 CST:
> Oh, yeah, I see that now...I tried compiling libxml2 on a bare-bones LFS
> system, hence didn't have `wget' installed yet! Is that worth
> mentioning as a dependency (test-suite only, like `bc' is for openssl)?
Yes, definitely.
> Wel
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 09/05/05 15:29 CST:
svm rm --force file
[snip]
I probably should have researched the svn remove command and tried
the various options. Thanks for the tip!
No problem. Except that obviously I meant to say 'svn', not 'svm' ;) I
Richard A Downing wrote these words on 09/05/05 15:11 CST:
> I shall not be able to finish this today, or maybe even tomorrow
> (family). If you have it ready to commit, please just do it. My toes
> have steel toecaps :-)
If it's only a couple of days, it can wait. I wiped out the changes
in my
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 09/05/05 15:28 CST:
Oh, yeah, I see that now...I tried compiling libxml2 on a bare-bones LFS
system, hence didn't have `wget' installed yet! Is that worth
mentioning as a dependency (test-suite only, like `bc' is for openssl)?
Yes,
14 matches
Mail list logo
